🔍 M&A DUE DILIGENCE

Technical due diligence in 24 hours, not 2 weeks.
Or you don't pay.

Get answers to your top 10 technical questions about any acquisition target's codebase. No engineering time required.

  • Connect any GitHub repo and ask questions immediately
  • Security vulnerabilities, test coverage, dependency health
  • Full refund if we can't answer your questions in 24 hours
2-4wk Typical DD

Traditional technical due diligence takes 2-4 weeks of senior engineer time. We do it in hours.

Start Due Diligence Connect the target's repo. Get answers in 24 hours.
# acquisition-target
CTO
Sarah • CTO 10:30 AM
@context Are there any hardcoded credentials or secrets in this codebase?
CX
critical.cx APP 10:30 AM
Found 3 potential issues:

1. config/database.yml line 23: hardcoded password
2. lib/stripe_client.rb line 7: API key in source
3. .env.example contains actual Stripe test key
Response time: 12.1s
CTO
Sarah • CTO 10:31 AM
Red flag noted. What's their test coverage?

Every question you'd ask, answered instantly.

Security

Critical

Hardcoded secrets, SQL injection vectors, XSS vulnerabilities, dependency CVEs, auth flow weaknesses.

Code Quality

Important

Test coverage, code complexity, documentation quality, dead code percentage, dependency health.

Architecture

Strategic

System design patterns, database schema, API contracts, scalability concerns, tech debt hotspots.

24-hour answers or your money back.

24-Hour Turnaround

Get answers to your top 10 technical DD questions within 24 hours of connecting the repo.

Full Refund Guarantee

If we can't answer your questions, you pay nothing. No questions asked.

NDA-Ready Security

Your target's code is analyzed in isolated containers. Never stored, never shared.

Spot red flags before signing the term sheet.

Technical due diligence that doesn't slow down your deal.

24-hour turnaround No engineer time required Money-back guarantee
Start Due Diligence Pre-meeting intelligence on any codebase.
$ context analyze target-repo
Scanning for security issues...
✓ 3 issues found
Analyzing test coverage...
✓ 67% coverage
Checking dependencies...
• 12 outdated packages
$